Quantcast Daily Trojan

Daily Trojan USC.edu

RSS

Late reversal by Coliseum Commission

Coliseum officials agree to negotiations with USC after Wednesday's meeting.

Dan Greenspan

Issue date: 12/6/07 Section: News
  • Page 1 of 1
Fighting on | Students gather outside the Coliseum to urge the commission and the university to reach an agreement on lease negotiations. USC recently announced it is negotiating with the Rose Bowl to bring Trojan football to Pasadena.
Media Credit: Constance Shao | Daily Trojan
Fighting on | Students gather outside the Coliseum to urge the commission and the university to reach an agreement on lease negotiations. USC recently announced it is negotiating with the Rose Bowl to bring Trojan football to Pasadena.

The Coliseum Commission is willing to negotiate a long-term agreement with USC, it announced late Wednesday after a closed-door meeting.

"We have evaluated our past proposals to USC, and their proposals to us, and are putting together what we believe are the best parts of these proposals," President Bernard C. Parks said in a written statement. "We will be expediting our proposal to them."

USC Senior Vice President for Administration Todd R. Dickey said the change of course was cause for optimism.

"I'm encouraged by the statement because it sounds like they're not going to wait and they're going to put together a counterproposal," Dickey told the Los Angeles Times.

Only hours earlier, it seemed the chances of the Trojans playing in the Coliseum next year were slim after the two sides faced off during a tense open session in which there were no substantive discussions of possible lease proposals in front of an overflowing Coliseum board room.

The tone was hardly conciliatory as Dickey went face-to-face with the nine-member board and Coliseum General Manager Pat Lynch for the first time since the university's public relations blitz began last Tuesday.

Citing repeated attempts to blame the impasse on the lack of a long-term lease with the state of California, which the commission claims prevents the establishment of a fixed rent, Dickey accused the panel of looking for a scapegoat.

"I'm a little dismayed that the time has been spent talking about the past and not the future," he said. "Now we're hearing it's the state's fault."

Commissioner Yvonne B. Burke countered: "We're at the mercy of the state. We're not going to pay them $2 million [in rent], and you're not going to pay them $2 million."

But the sharpest barbs came in response to a USC website that urged the Trojan community to bombard the commission with letters, e-mail and phone calls.

Parks said that university administrators' poor judgement had resulted in several commissioners and Coliseum employees being threatened, and he received a racially charged voicemail. The response led Parks to call USC President Steven B. Sample on Tuesday night to voice his frustrations.

"[The Trojan community] may not know it's a negotiating strategy and that you did not send them out to conquer on behalf of Troy," Parks said he told Sample. "I am very offended by the treatment of people who work here. That is more important than the games of a team that plays here six times a year."

In the interim, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa stepped to the forefront in attempts to forge a long-term lease. In a letter to the commission, Villaraigosa presented the outline of a seven-point plan he believes should frame any agreement concerning the Coliseum.

"I believe that the future of the Coliseum is inconceivable without USC," Villaraigosa wrote. "I am committed to working together as teammates to get this agreement over the goal line."

Villaraigosa's letter made no mention of holding out hope for an NFL team at the Coliseum, and last Wednesday, Villaraigosa said "the Coliseum is no longer a viable option" for a team.

Parks disagreed: "I don't think you foreclose the possibility of a multi-billion dollar business coming [to South Los Angeles]."

Villaraigosa's press secretary, Matt Szabo, said the mayor and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger have spoken on the issue at least twice with more high level discussions between their staffs.

"[Villaraigosa and Schwarzenegger] have been very supportive," Dickey said.

USC students, alumni and members of the public were invited to address the commission and most backed the university.

Undergraduate Student Government President Sahil Chaudry said that moving home games to Pasadena after more that 80 years would damage the relationship between the university and South Los Angeles.

"For us to move someplace like the Rose Bowl, there's no continuity of spirit, no relationship with the community, and that's an important part of being a neighbor here," Chaudry said. "We would lose a lot of that Trojan spirit by moving away from the Coliseum."

Holden Slusher, a junior majoring in real estate development, said he skipped class to attend in support of USC.

"Being a student who grew up loving Trojan football, coming to the Coliseum with my family ... the fact that we might not play here anymore was just so sad to me," he said. "It is our home and we belong here."

Complicating matters is tonight's closed-door session of the Rose Bowl Operating Company, in which it will consider USC's one-year proposal to begin playing games in Pasadena next season.

"Whether it's ready to be acted upon will be discussed," Rose Bowl General Manager Darryl Dunn said.

Dickey said the university is ready to sign once a lease is finalized.

"I'm not going to jerk them around at this point," he said. "Time is of the essence."



- Dan Loeterman contributed to this report.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 5 of 8

ONTIME

posted 12/06/07 @ 9:05 AM PST

THIS DOESN'T MAKE SENSE, USC USES THE STADIUM ON A SEASONAL BASIS AND YET IS EXPECTED TO PAY FOR A FULL YEAR.

TRY AND SEE IF THE STATE WILL SETTLE FOR A SMALL SHARE OF THE STADIUM TAKE ON A SEASONAL BASIS WITH A GARUNTEE OF CONTINUOUS LEASE AND PUBLICATION OF ALL TERMS FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Coliseum Fan

posted 12/06/07 @ 1:39 PM PST

The negotiation is not just about a fixed rent. Its about the abject failure of LA City government to do anything right. USC is trying as they might, to help the city do the right thing. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

David Keeling

posted 12/06/07 @ 10:11 PM PST

Bernard Parks continues to be a stumbling block for a "peaceful" resolution in this matter where now the State & City heads of leadership say give SC the control. (Continued…)

Kevin Connors

posted 12/07/07 @ 7:54 AM PST

Has anyone considered that USC may be embarrassed to have a national audience tuning in next fall, to what could be the highest rated college football game of the year, when Ohio State comes to play USC? After all, from a purely visual standpoint the Rose Bowl is a hell of a lot more impressive than the Coliseum. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

visitor

posted 12/28/07 @ 8:49 AM PST

most people view california as their home ,
my understanding is that this is related in a business
classified, the issues we have discussed or the basic part of ,this fight let's share our field and games, open this to all as well as the community we all share we should be united in this, and make sure we get OUR fair share. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Comments and Forum Posting Policy


Thank you for your interest and participation in the Daily Trojan comments and online forum system. To safeguard USC's Principles of Community while fostering a healthy campus dialogue, we require users to follow these basic posting guidelines:

Right to Delete Posts
Any postings that the Daily Trojan deems incongruent with its policies - including messages that are defamatory, obscene, abusive or in violation of copyright or trademark laws - are subject to editing or deletion. Although the Daily Trojan cannot reasonably expect to review every forum posting and is not responsible for any posted content, it reserves the right to monitor forums and remove posting privileges of users who violate these terms. All messages must be written in English.

Posting Rules
Comments, interactive areas, discussion boards, and the Daily Trojan Forums are intended to encourage public debate. We expect participants to differ ? judgment and opinion are subjective, and we encourage freedom of speech and a marketplace of ideas. But by using these areas of our website, you are participating in a community that is intended for all our users. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any content posted on our site at any time for any reason.

Decisions as to whether content violates any Posting Rule will be made by the Daily Trojan at its sole discretion, after having received actual notice of such posting. Without limiting our right to remove content, we have attempted to provide guidelines to those posting content on our site. When using our website, please do not post material that:

  • contains vulgar, profane, abusive or hateful language, epithets or slurs, text or illustrations in poor taste, inflammatory attacks of a personal, racial or religious nature, or expressions of bigotry, racism, discrimination or hate.
  • is defamatory, threatening, disparaging, grossly inflammatory, false, misleading, deceptive, fraudulent, inaccurate, unfair, contains gross exaggeration or unsubstantiated claims, violates the privacy rights of any third party, is unreasonably harmful or offensive to any individual or community, contains any actionable statement, or tends to mislead or reflect unfairly on any other person, business or entity.
  • violates any right of the Daily Trojan or any third party.
  • discriminates on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, gender, age, marital status, sexual orientation or disability, or refers to such matters in any manner prohibited by law.
  • violates any municipal, state or federal law, rule, regulation or ordinance, or attempts to encourage such an evasion or violation.
  • unfairly interferes with any third party?s uninterrupted use of the Daily Trojan.
  • advertises, promotes or offers to trade any goods or services, except in areas specifically designated for such purpose.
  • uploads copyrighted or other proprietary material of any kind on our website without the express permission of the owner of that material.
  • uses or attempts to use another?s account, password, service or system except as expressly permitted by the Terms of Service.
  • includes images, photos, or articles or other content that constitutes, promotes or encourages illegal acts, violation of any right of any individual or entity, violation of any local, state, national or international law, rule, guideline or regulation, or otherwise creates liability.
  • uploads or transmits viruses or other harmful, disruptive or destructive files.
  • disrupts, interferes with, or otherwise harms or violates the security of our website, or any services, system resources, accounts, passwords, servers or networks connected to or accessible through our website or affiliated or linked sites.
  • "flames" any individual or entity (e.g., sends repeated messages related to another user and/or makes derogatory or offensive comments about another individual), or repeats prior posting of the same message under multiple threads or subjects.

(Adapted from the Los Angeles Times Forums Policies with permission.)

 

Advertisement

Advertisements

Advertisement

Sections


Site Features

On The Go

Information

Poll

Which attribute of housing around the University Park Campus is most important to you?

Submit Vote

View Results