Daily Trojan USC.edu

RSS

USC officials limit access to Bovard

Students must now get clearance by showing their USC ID to get inside.

Dan Loeterman

Issue date: 4/16/07 Section: News
  • Page 1 of 1
USC officials are restricting access to the Bovard Administration Building in response to a sit-in staged at President Steven B. Sample's Bovard office on Tuesday by the activist group SCALE.

The move ensures that neither Student Coalition Against Labor Exploitation nor any other student group will have the same opportunity, at least in the near future.

Department of Public Safety officers have been stationed outside the entrance to Bovard during the day since Wednesday. Faculty members entering the building have been asked to show their USC ID, and students are required to be on a pre-approved list before they are allowed inside.

It is unclear how the security measures will work. Todd Dickey, senior vice president for administration and general counsel, said that the system will operate with a list.

DPS Chief Carey Drayton, however, said officers would not be ordered to prevent students from entering Bovard unless it was clear they were going to make a disturbance.

The new security measures will continue until further notice, said Dickey, who added that the decision to post the DPS officers was made directly in response to SCALE's actions last week.

"I did it because (13) students took over the president's office on Tuesday," Dickey said. "We are a business. It is the only choice we have."

Yet the new security measures left some students wondering if the university administration has gone too far in its attempt to maintain order.

"I think it's ridiculous. It's a sign of disregard for student freedom and student expression," said Eduardo Virgen, a senior majoring in American studies and ethnicity who has previously worked in Bovard. Virgen attended SCALE's protest last week, but is not affiliated with the group.

Drayton, who was consulted about the decision, said the measures are a precaution and not an attempt to quell free speech.

Drayton said he is not sure how long the security measures will stay in place but that the officers could be gone from their Bovard posts as soon as today, depending on how administrators decide to proceed.

"It was never the intent to stop someone from expressing their freedoms. When emotions run high, you need a cooling-off period," Drayton said.

"All we were doing is attempting to stop these people, unknown, from coming in to do something to the occupants of that building," he said. "The only thing in the post order is to stop and identify yourself and let us know where you're going."

Drayton also said security on campus would not be adversely affected by the officers working at Bovard because they are working on overtime.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 12

Athena Sunga and Shruti Pant

posted 4/15/07 @ 8:10 PM PST

Dear Fellow Trojans (Faculty, Students, Staff, Officials, and President Sample):

Following SCALE's protest last week, the need for FAIR TRADE was heightened, yet the repercussions were less than positive. (Continued…)

Chris

posted 4/15/07 @ 11:13 PM PST

This makes perfect sense to me, actually. It is making it harder for students to change policy, but it is not in any way preventing expression. Opinions can be voiced and protests can be staged without directly interfering with the day-to-day running of the University. (Continued…)

John

posted 4/16/07 @ 12:28 AM PST

Isn't it amusing how SCALE always accuses the University of buying products produced with sweatshop labor, yet when pressed when details can never get more specific? And in response the University can point out how it's actually a part of ~3 anti-sweatshop organizations that are actually stricter and have better oversight than the one that SCALE promotes? And now, thanks to them, my student org can't get Bovard access. (Continued…)

Ashok Kumar

posted 4/16/07 @ 7:28 AM PST

I am sure that is what students who have been organizing for seven years were doing wrong, calling it "sweat-free" instead of "fair-trade". I have read many a dumb thing in my life, but I have to say this one takes the cake. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Teresa (from SCALE)

posted 4/16/07 @ 7:43 AM PST

Thank you for your insightful comments.

The SCALE campaign is not a fair trade campaign. The sweat free and fair trade campaigns are quite dissimliar. (Continued…)

Ashok Kumar

posted 4/16/07 @ 7:46 AM PST

Just checked out the Facebook group. Sorry to harp on this but I have to reiterate that it is the dumbest group on facebook, bar-none. Even more then the one actually called "I live in poop":

http://wisc. (Continued…)

Andy Bunting

posted 4/16/07 @ 8:52 AM PST

If you want more details about SCALE, then come to our Q&A session on Wednesday, at 5pm in VKC 155, and hear some truth. Of course, it's quite possible that you won't even come, John, because it maybe satisfies you enough to post on the daily trojan website with a tone of great authority. (Continued…)

teresac

Teresa (from SCALE)

posted 4/16/07 @ 10:06 AM PST

sorry I meant 5 pm, not 7 pm for the teach-in on Wednesday

Dirk De Durr

posted 4/16/07 @ 10:26 AM PST

SCALE folks typify the problem with the left in this country. Free speech is granted wholesale by USC, such that you can demonstrate, and there is dialogue. (Continued…)

Shruti Pant

posted 4/16/07 @ 12:08 PM PST

Two things must be mentioned before we illustrate our point.

Firstly, I (Shruti) HAVE WORKED with the World Bank AND Sweatshop factories in Thailand and Indonesia, where I have had my fair share of first hand experience talking to and understanding the needs of the people who work there. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Comments and Forum Posting Policy


Thank you for your interest and participation in the Daily Trojan comments and online forum system. To safeguard USC's Principles of Community while fostering a healthy campus dialogue, we require users to follow these basic posting guidelines:

Right to Delete Posts
Any postings that the Daily Trojan deems incongruent with its policies - including messages that are defamatory, obscene, abusive or in violation of copyright or trademark laws - are subject to editing or deletion. Although the Daily Trojan cannot reasonably expect to review every forum posting and is not responsible for any posted content, it reserves the right to monitor forums and remove posting privileges of users who violate these terms. All messages must be written in English.

Posting Rules
Comments, interactive areas, discussion boards, and the Daily Trojan Forums are intended to encourage public debate. We expect participants to differ ? judgment and opinion are subjective, and we encourage freedom of speech and a marketplace of ideas. But by using these areas of our website, you are participating in a community that is intended for all our users. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any content posted on our site at any time for any reason.

Decisions as to whether content violates any Posting Rule will be made by the Daily Trojan at its sole discretion, after having received actual notice of such posting. Without limiting our right to remove content, we have attempted to provide guidelines to those posting content on our site. When using our website, please do not post material that:

  • contains vulgar, profane, abusive or hateful language, epithets or slurs, text or illustrations in poor taste, inflammatory attacks of a personal, racial or religious nature, or expressions of bigotry, racism, discrimination or hate.
  • is defamatory, threatening, disparaging, grossly inflammatory, false, misleading, deceptive, fraudulent, inaccurate, unfair, contains gross exaggeration or unsubstantiated claims, violates the privacy rights of any third party, is unreasonably harmful or offensive to any individual or community, contains any actionable statement, or tends to mislead or reflect unfairly on any other person, business or entity.
  • violates any right of the Daily Trojan or any third party.
  • discriminates on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, gender, age, marital status, sexual orientation or disability, or refers to such matters in any manner prohibited by law.
  • violates any municipal, state or federal law, rule, regulation or ordinance, or attempts to encourage such an evasion or violation.
  • unfairly interferes with any third party?s uninterrupted use of the Daily Trojan.
  • advertises, promotes or offers to trade any goods or services, except in areas specifically designated for such purpose.
  • uploads copyrighted or other proprietary material of any kind on our website without the express permission of the owner of that material.
  • uses or attempts to use another?s account, password, service or system except as expressly permitted by the Terms of Service.
  • includes images, photos, or articles or other content that constitutes, promotes or encourages illegal acts, violation of any right of any individual or entity, violation of any local, state, national or international law, rule, guideline or regulation, or otherwise creates liability.
  • uploads or transmits viruses or other harmful, disruptive or destructive files.
  • disrupts, interferes with, or otherwise harms or violates the security of our website, or any services, system resources, accounts, passwords, servers or networks connected to or accessible through our website or affiliated or linked sites.
  • "flames" any individual or entity (e.g., sends repeated messages related to another user and/or makes derogatory or offensive comments about another individual), or repeats prior posting of the same message under multiple threads or subjects.

(Adapted from the Los Angeles Times Forums Policies with permission.)

 

Advertisement

Advertisements

Advertisement

Sections


Site Features

On The Go

Information

Poll

Which attribute of housing around the University Park Campus is most important to you?

Submit Vote

View Results