Quantcast Daily Trojan

Daily Trojan USC.edu

RSS

Packing my bags as Conquest moves in

Joanna Lin

Issue date: 2/21/07 Section: Opinion
  • Page 1 of 1
Media Credit: Liz Belfer | Daily Trojan

I have the best housing in the University Park Campus area. My roommate and I each have our own rooms and bathrooms, plus gated parking and a five-minute walk to campus-and we pay about the same as when we lived across the street in a one-bedroom hellhole owned by Conquest Student Housing.

My building was one of the best-kept secrets of the neighborhood. It was managed by a family who had resisted Conquest's land-grabbing for decades as it tried to remain financially viable amid Conquest's funeral procession of Benjamins.

Then, this past weekend two nondescript people in matching, polo shirts - clipboard, camera and tape measure in tow - invaded our haven and declared: "You are now Conquest tenants."

For such a decidedly somber message, these words were said with an unsettling perkiness.

I remember my Conquest experience clearly, and I don't have any interest in a sequel.

For my sophomore year, I signed a lease on an apartment I was not allowed to tour beforehand - a huge mistake on my part, but also super sketchy of Conquest. My roommate and I were moving into one of its older buildings, but always being the thoughtful bunch, Conquest said we would move into one with a newly renovated interior.

And how! The inside was so new, in fact, that when we moved in one week after our official move-in date, the bathroom was still under construction. As winter came, we discovered our heater didn't work properly. Repeated "fixes" left us with the option to leave the heat blasting at 90 degrees when we went to bed or to sleep through 40-degree nights. When our stove needed replacing, it was done promptly, but the installer turned on the gas and left the pilot light unlit - a gas-leaking time bomb we discovered ourselves days later.

My experience was nothing compared to that of expectant Tuscany residents in August, but since Conquest couldn't touch up an existing building in three months or competently maintain it throughout my lease, I have little confidence that my current situation will be any different.

Come June 1, Conquest will begin converting my building into "luxury" apartments, give it an Italian name and tack on at least a 185 percent rent increase, which I was told will steadily skyrocket as the move-in date nears. The rent hike was conveniently omitted from the notice (considerately taped to the door, two days after Conquest employees invited themselves over), but the eager beavers have already boasted their conquest of this building online.

When I wanted nothing more than to get out of Conquest, I was frequently reminded that time was running out to renew my lease. But now, when all I want to do is stay in my apartment, Conquest has given me the boot.

Unlike other existing Conquest tenants, I now have only two days to decide whether to renew my lease through some private arrangement before Friday, after which prospective Conquest tenants will find out if they received their housing of choice.

Or, I "have the opportunity," as the notice states, to wait until everything is filled up and then meet with Conquest a week later to see if I can be squeezed in anywhere.

Wow, Conquest. Do you mean to tell me I can have my pick of overpriced, overrated housing this week or wait to be bamboozled next week? Gosh, what attractive options!

Thanks, but I think I'll pass. Finding non-university housing is admittedly more difficult outside of Conquest's tidy online file number system, but the results are infinitely better. I pay less for more, and I actually feel as if I have a home - a rare, if not impossible, feeling to have under my new housing-monger landlord. My outgoing manager knows my first name and says hello whenever I see him. If I need anything fixed, I just go knock on his door, and he grabs his toolbox and heads over, right then and there. With Conquest, on the other hand, I'm addressed by a flier on the door as "Apartment #1" when I live in No. 7. And I don't think I have to get into maintenance again.

I don't yet know where I'll live next semester, but it certainly won't be where I am now. And if you're thinking of leasing my soon-to-be-available apartment, please reconsider. Conquest is giving the building's lackluster exterior a new facade, but that's all Conquest really is: a facade for housing that's just not worth the ordeal.

-

Joanna Lin is an American studies junior from Lafayette, Calif. Carlo Romero's column, "The Tonic," will return next Wednesday.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 3 of 3

Harold Lim

posted 2/21/07 @ 4:22 PM PST

This is exactly what happened to me any my roommate 2 years ago. We used to live in a very comfy 2bed/2bath apartment in Ellendale and then sometime in September, conquest notified us that they have bought the apartment. (Continued…)

jeannine sosocal@earthlink.net

posted 2/21/07 @ 10:08 PM PST

While I understand your concerns about a poor management group, how can you be worried about rent increases? I assume that LA rent control would apply to you, since you are already in the building. (Continued…)

Ashley

posted 2/26/07 @ 3:05 AM PST

You make many valid points. Conquest is taking over and with little concern for the little landlord. However, it is important to consider that Conquest is not a typical landlord; they own several buildings at the University of Southern California as well as UC Santa Barbara. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Comments and Forum Posting Policy


Thank you for your interest and participation in the Daily Trojan comments and online forum system. To safeguard USC's Principles of Community while fostering a healthy campus dialogue, we require users to follow these basic posting guidelines:

Right to Delete Posts
Any postings that the Daily Trojan deems incongruent with its policies - including messages that are defamatory, obscene, abusive or in violation of copyright or trademark laws - are subject to editing or deletion. Although the Daily Trojan cannot reasonably expect to review every forum posting and is not responsible for any posted content, it reserves the right to monitor forums and remove posting privileges of users who violate these terms. All messages must be written in English.

Posting Rules
Comments, interactive areas, discussion boards, and the Daily Trojan Forums are intended to encourage public debate. We expect participants to differ ? judgment and opinion are subjective, and we encourage freedom of speech and a marketplace of ideas. But by using these areas of our website, you are participating in a community that is intended for all our users. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any content posted on our site at any time for any reason.

Decisions as to whether content violates any Posting Rule will be made by the Daily Trojan at its sole discretion, after having received actual notice of such posting. Without limiting our right to remove content, we have attempted to provide guidelines to those posting content on our site. When using our website, please do not post material that:

  • contains vulgar, profane, abusive or hateful language, epithets or slurs, text or illustrations in poor taste, inflammatory attacks of a personal, racial or religious nature, or expressions of bigotry, racism, discrimination or hate.
  • is defamatory, threatening, disparaging, grossly inflammatory, false, misleading, deceptive, fraudulent, inaccurate, unfair, contains gross exaggeration or unsubstantiated claims, violates the privacy rights of any third party, is unreasonably harmful or offensive to any individual or community, contains any actionable statement, or tends to mislead or reflect unfairly on any other person, business or entity.
  • violates any right of the Daily Trojan or any third party.
  • discriminates on the grounds of race, religion, national origin, gender, age, marital status, sexual orientation or disability, or refers to such matters in any manner prohibited by law.
  • violates any municipal, state or federal law, rule, regulation or ordinance, or attempts to encourage such an evasion or violation.
  • unfairly interferes with any third party?s uninterrupted use of the Daily Trojan.
  • advertises, promotes or offers to trade any goods or services, except in areas specifically designated for such purpose.
  • uploads copyrighted or other proprietary material of any kind on our website without the express permission of the owner of that material.
  • uses or attempts to use another?s account, password, service or system except as expressly permitted by the Terms of Service.
  • includes images, photos, or articles or other content that constitutes, promotes or encourages illegal acts, violation of any right of any individual or entity, violation of any local, state, national or international law, rule, guideline or regulation, or otherwise creates liability.
  • uploads or transmits viruses or other harmful, disruptive or destructive files.
  • disrupts, interferes with, or otherwise harms or violates the security of our website, or any services, system resources, accounts, passwords, servers or networks connected to or accessible through our website or affiliated or linked sites.
  • "flames" any individual or entity (e.g., sends repeated messages related to another user and/or makes derogatory or offensive comments about another individual), or repeats prior posting of the same message under multiple threads or subjects.

(Adapted from the Los Angeles Times Forums Policies with permission.)

 

Advertisement

Advertisements

Advertisement

Sections


Site Features

On The Go

Information

Poll

Which attribute of housing around the University Park Campus is most important to you?

Submit Vote

View Results